Prediction of Stijn Slump [539th] vs Darwin Blanch [541st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L W W L
Form
W L W L W W W L W LHead To Head: Slump 1 - 1 Blanch
They have played 4 sets in total, with Slump winning 2 and Blanch winning 2. The last match between Slump and Blanch was at the M15 Villena, 27-02-2025, Second, Hard with Stijn Slump getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stijn Slump | 1 |
| Darwin Blanch | 1 |
| Slump | Stats | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (14-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 539 | Ranking | 541 |
| 505 | Highest Rank | 541 |
| 26 | Age | 17 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 59% (123-85) | Career Total W/L | 57% (55-41) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $13,795 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Stijn Slump
Player
Darwin Blanch
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Stijn Slump
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 20 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:29:14 | Average Match Time | 1:29:14 |
| 56% (65/117) | 1st Serve % | 68% (83/122) |
| 65% (42/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (59/83) |
| 62% (32/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 37% (45/122) | Return Points Win % | 37% (43/117) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stijn Slump vs Darwin Blanch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Slump 1 - 1 Blanch
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Slump has won 45.18% of points on their second serve, while Blanch has won 45.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Slump, in recent form, has won 41.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Blanch has won 44.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.47% and 27.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Slump has saved 52.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blanch has saved 57.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Slump has won 60% of matches played (W/L 39/ 26), with Blanch winning 62.75% (W/L 32/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Slump has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 99/ 63), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Blanch has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 36/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 19/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Slump has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.81% of matches (W/L 35/ 19), where as Blanch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.17% of matches (W/L 30/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Slump winning 1 times and Blanch being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Slump winning 2 and Blanch winning 2. The last match between Slump and Blanch was at the M15 Villena, 27-02-2025, Second, Hard with Stijn Slump getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Slump and Blanch have played a deciding set 0 times, with Slump winning 0 times and Blanch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Slump winning 0, and Blanch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Slump has played against opponents with an average rank of 114.91 while Blanch has played against players with an average rank of 183.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Slump has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blanch has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Slump has converted 29.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blanch has converted 35.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Stijn Slump Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stijn Slump
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marlon Vankan
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Alvaro Peiro Serrano
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriel Ghetu
Player
Stijn Slump
75%
(
85 of
114)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
47 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Emilien Demanet
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Dali Blanch
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Stijn Slump
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Stijn Slump
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Yaroslav Demin
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Darwin Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Darwin Blanch
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefan Dostanic
Player
Darwin Blanch
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Ronald Hohmann
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Patrick Maloney
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
35%
(
12 of
34)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Darwin Blanch
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Darwin Blanch
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Dali Blanch
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Slump vs Blanch?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Slump Vs Blanch is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (123/85) | Win/Loss | 57% (55/41) |
| 58% (275/196) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (123/100) |
| 54% (2352/2021) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1069/985) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 515 | Aces Total | 236 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 417 | Total Double Faults | 190 |
| 1:10:16 | Average Match Time | 1:20:56 |
| 78.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 180.41 |
| 55% (4988/9126) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3354/5364) |
| 70% (3488/4988) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2242/3354) |
| 52% (2143/4138) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1012/2010) |
| 43% (416/957) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (222/521) |
| 40% (3720/9233) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2145/5455) |
| 59% (123/207) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (54/95) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (22/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
| 48% (26/54) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (18/32) |
| 89% (125/111) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (53/44) |
| 11% (125/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (53/9) |
| 14% (83/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (43/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
